What If Cards Earned Royalties For Owners?

In this video, I discuss an idea to incentivize card ownership - royalties through battles won if a card is rented out. Many people complain there isn't enough of a reason to own cards but this may add some value in the long run for those that like to collect. What do you think?


Join Splinterlands: https://bit.ly/3EytmxR
My music on Spotify/Apple/etc: https://linktr.ee/aftersound

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
4 comments
avatar

Really interesting topic, but I think sps is not worth that much to cut more renters, who have big cost of playing in top champ.

0
0
0.000
avatar

As a card owner, I don't think this is needed. If renting is better value than owning, more people need to change from owners to renters. If enough do, we'll eventually reach an equilibrium. If people aren't doing that it's because there are other reasons preventing them to.

0
0
0.000
avatar

One thing is sure, something needs to be done to make cards hold their value better as it's impossible to outearn the expected decline which makes it so that no new players will come in.

What I suggest is the following (Full Article)

  1. Create a new Pay2Play Game Mode where players pay some DEC or Credits to enter which is Fun, Easy, and puts everyone on a level playing field.
  2. Give Packs as a reward making it an indirect way to purchase them, also possibly include Glints, some SPS or Cosmitic Items.
  3. Pay a share of the DEC that is paid to enter to those who provide the cards for this game mode by locking them on Land.
0
0
0.000
avatar

I do agree that people need incentives to own cards, but there's probably has to be less demanding but more creative ways for this to be done, although royalties aren't a bad idea, but it might be a huge discussion

0
0
0.000