SplinterGlossary: Updating Older Definitions Completed

avatar

This is the weekly update on the progress of SplinterGlossary.

What Is SplinterGlossary?

SplinterGlossary is that section of LeoGlossary that defines a glossary of inter-linked terms and definitions for Splinterlands. LeoGlossary is focused on financial, general crypto, but also including Hive and Leofinance terms and definitions, banking terms, insurance terms, and a series of specific lists.

Numbers of the Week

This week I have added 2 new terms to the glossary but haven't defined them, so we are now at 323 terms and 12 lists.

Some Details

Incredible, but it's done! Updating older definitions are out of my to-do list for the time being. But it'll probably come back at a later time, as this is a cyclical thing, especially since Splinterlands changes so often and information current today may not be actual in two weeks or a month.

Splinterlands added two new rulesets. I only added the terms, but haven't defined them yet, because I was focused to finish the updating process. Their turn will come next week.

Plans for Next Week

Next week I'll start adding new things to the glossary. Besides the two new rulesets, land will be the main focus. Although I hoped to have even more information than we currently do, there is enough to be added from what we know already and I haven't gotten to it until now.

Final Words

Remember that the success or not of this project depends a lot on the contribution of others. When you use terms defined in SplinterGlossary in your Splinterlands/gaming posts, it would be great if you'd link them to those definition posts.

Also, if you notice something wrong with any defined terms, please let me know in these weekly updates.

Image source: 1

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
18 comments
avatar

I have also buy some chest cards and buy land and playing sprinterland game. Hopefully this game is interesting more people's come to join this game become more popular. Thanks for sharing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

What kind of land have you bought?

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is a lot of work but worth it. LeoGlossary is a great addition to Hive.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, it is. If we only count it through its informational value in our ecosystem, where it may become a preferred source of information in some cases, it's worth it.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for all the work with Splinter Glossary. I was also a bit confused when I saw the new rule sets. It took a while to get use to it but it's putting more and more abilities in front of people.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

They may want to give a harder time to bots to adapt by coming out with new rulesets regularly, as one of the measures.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I guess it could but the bots will generally adapt faster than the players once they get used to it. I feel that it is more of a way to delay that.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I feel that it is more of a way to delay that.

That's the point, I think, to disrupt their dominance for a short while. Then, when they adapt, do it again.

I disagree about bots adapting faster. I think people adapt to changing rules faster than Splinterlands bots do. They lose in the long term, once bots catch up, though.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I might have been wrong about the bots adapting but I think more rule sets in the long run just make it more complicated for everyone. At this point, there just seems to be way too many for any new user to get used to. So I wonder if it's hurting the game more than it helps to fight the bots.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I don't bother learning new rulesets. I just see what the rulesets are when the game starts. And based on them take decisions in the time needed to select the lineup. Maybe it won't be optimized, but with a growing number of rulesets and abilities, it seems the only way to manage them all.

Btw, Matt mentioned he is thinking to add 3 rulesets instead of 2 to fight bots. To be honest, I believe that would be too much for humans to take in. And, the question is, do we want to reduce the influence of bots at the expense of user experience?

0
0
0.000