RE: I've been voted into top20 just to be forced to vote on a Splinterlands proposal
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I am very sorry that you got involved in this, or that there is even anything to get involved in. I responded to pharesim's post with a similar message that Aggroed does not speak for Splinterlands nor for me. I don't want any part in what he is doing and wish he would have just stayed out of it.
I am not posting this to try to get anyone to support the proposal, I would not go asking or certainly not trying to coerce people for votes, but I feel like my character and intentions are being attacked as a result of what Aggroed has been doing and I just wanted to set the record straight.
0
0
0.000
No hard feelings. I'm not voting for the proposal because it sounds like a threat and lacks details on how you want to spend those funds. Other stakeholders also expressed similar opinions multiple times. I could consider a different one. It's just about this one being bad, nothing personal.
This post is not about the proposal, it's about how someone wants to enforce their vision.
Isn't aggroed the CEO of Spliterlands?
No, I took over as CEO last year. Here is the announcement post about that for your reference: https://peakd.com/splinterlands/@splinterlands/staff-reductions-and-restructuring-announcement
Didn't know about that change, thanks.
I believe and consider that before acting on behalf of Splinterlands, asking on behalf of Splinterlands, launching proposals or seeking funding, as a team you should have had a conversation and defined the methods to be used.